The item on the agenda was an appeal of a denial of a taxi company
license and a taxi operator's license for a young man who had been employed as
a driver with a local taxi company for the previous 5 years. Although he had a rather blemished driving
record, he pointed out that he'd been relicensed by the City every year for 5
years; his worst mistakes were old and he was 27 now; and the City had no
problem with his driving record until he tried to strike out on his own. The
only witnesses against his appeal were 3 other taxi-company owners; there were
at least a dozen people testifying in favor. And yet, he lost his appeal, 4-3.
A travesty of justice, to be sure: The criteria for the license
were that he be able to show by a preponderance of the evidence that granting
the licenses would not adversely affect public health, safety, or welfare. An
adverse affect would be more of an effect than already had existed; if the City
had no problem with his driving habits for 5 years and nothing essentially had
changed, then allowing him to continue to drive a taxi could have no adverse
effect.
The gentleman's appeal, however, was a case study in how not to appeal to a council. The following rules occur to this observer:
The gentleman's appeal, however, was a case study in how not to appeal to a council. The following rules occur to this observer:
Never bring children younger than 12 to a public meeting.
Especially don't bring anyone younger than 5. There are rules of decorum at
public meetings that very young children won't obey; you should find a
babysitter for them. Never use one as a prop.
Applause and speaking out of turn is against the rules, for good
reason; it can be a form of bullying. Ignorance of the rules, written on the
wall, irritates the Council.
Don't bring up irrelevancies: don't tell people what a great,
charitable guy you are; don't have people testifying to your character when it
is not at issue. Stick to the criteria in the ordinance; anything else is irritating
or can lead them astray.
More supporters does not mean more votes. More speakers saying the
same thing only irritates the council, lengthening an already long meeting. You
are only one item on a long agenda.
Last but not least, you and your friends are descending into a den
of Pharisees, elected by Pharisees, being watched on TV by Pharisees—as well as
a few people like you. Skin, especially tattoos, should be covered as much as
practical. Dress like you are going to court. You still won't be one of them,
but at least you will be giving them the deference they demand.
The vote was close. Essentially, he and his supporters blew it by
overdoing it. Throw in a little class prejudice, and the scales were tipped
against him. Councilors were offended, and some councilors seized on specious
reasons, some supplied by the appellant, to deny the license.
No comments:
Post a Comment